Search for: All records

Networkswith Remote DirectMemoryAccess (RDMA) support are becoming increasingly common. RDMA, however, offers a limited programming interface to remote memory that consists of read, write and atomic operations. With RDMA alone, completing the most basic operations on remote data structures often requires multiple round-trips over the network. Data-intensive systems strongly desire higher-level communication abstractions that supportmore complex interaction patterns. A natural candidate to consider is MPI, the de facto standard for developing high-performance applications in the HPC community. This paper critically evaluates the communication primitives of MPI and shows that using MPI in the context of a data processing system comes with its own set of insurmountable challenges. Based on this analysis, we propose a new communication abstraction named RDMO, or Remote DirectMemory Operation, that dispatches a short sequence of reads, writes and atomic operations to remote memory and executes them in a single round-trip. 

Storing data structures in high-capacity byte-addressable persistent memory instead of DRAM or a storage device offers the opportunity to (1) reduce cost and power consumption compared with DRAM, (2) decrease the latency and CPU resources needed for an I/O operation compared with storage, and (3) allow for fast recovery as the data structure remains in memory after a machine failure. The first commercial offering in this space is Intel® Optane™ Direct Connect (Optane™ DC) Persistent Memory. Optane™ DC promises access time within a constant factor of DRAM, with larger capacity, lower energy consumption, and persistence. We present an experimental evaluation of persistent transactional memory performance, and explore how Optane™ DC durability domains affect the overall results. Given that neither of the two available durability domains can deliver performance competitive with DRAM, we introduce and emulate a new durability domain, called PDRAM, in which the memory controller tracks enough information (and has enough reserve power) to make DRAM behave like a persistent cache of Optane™ DC memory.In this paper we compare the performance of these durability domains on several configurations of five persistent transactional memory applications. We find a large throughput difference, which emphasizes the importance of choosing the best durability domain for each application and system. At the same time, our results confirm that recently published persistent transactional memory algorithms are able to scale, and that recent optimizations for these algorithms lead to strong performance, with speedups as high as 6× at 16 threads.